Call toll free 877.219.2514
Nobody Talks, Everybody Walks. Ohio criminal defense lawyer with nearly 40 years experience

“When I was arrested by the Feds on Drug Conspiracy charges, they told me I was facing mandatory life in federal prison without the possibility of parole. I knew that I was innocent, but I was scared . . . so I knew that I would have to find a lawyer who was not afraid of the Feds and would take my case to trial. I chose Greg Robey because he is a fighter. After over 2 weeks in a federal jury trial, I was found Not Guilty of all charges. My family and I am forever grateful to Mr. Robey.” -L.B., Mansfield, Ohio

Are Courts Diluting Protection from Unlawful Searches?

Evidence comes in many forms. What you say and the objects in your possession can be used against you by law enforcement officers if your statements and property are legally obtained. But what about the information on your cell phone?

Cell phones are a one-stop shop to your whereabouts, activities, thoughts and associates. Your electronic footprint can say more about you in a glance than an hour of questioning with an attorney present.

Recent developments in the battle over whether cell phone data is private or discoverable without a warrant include the following:

  • In July 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that law enforcement officers may compel cell phone service providers to turn over historical cell site location information of subscribers without a search warrant.
  • Earlier in July 2013, the Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled that law enforcement officers must have a search warrant before pursuing cell phone tracking information from a cell phone provider.
  • Montana and Maine have passed legislation to prohibit the receipt of cell phone location information by law enforcement without a warrant. Governor Jerry Brown vetoed similar legislation in California.
  • In August 2013, the Obama Administration filed a petition requesting that the Supreme Court of the United States rule on whether the Fourth Amendment allows warrantless cell phone searches.

Since the use of a cell phone is voluntary and users readily provide tracking information to cell phone service providers, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that consumers are aware that cell phone tracking information is not held private.

The controversy is clear. How soon the question is settled depends on the U.S. Supreme Court. If you are arrested in Ohio, speak with an attorney at the Law Office of Gregory S. Robey experienced with your specific criminal charges and with the issues of search and seizure.


Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


Contact Form

Contact The Law Office of Gregory S. Robey

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.