Call toll free 877.219.2514
Nobody Talks, Everybody Walks. Ohio criminal defense lawyer with nearly 40 years experience

“When I was arrested by the Feds on Drug Conspiracy charges, they told me I was facing mandatory life in federal prison without the possibility of parole. I knew that I was innocent, but I was scared . . . so I knew that I would have to find a lawyer who was not afraid of the Feds and would take my case to trial. I chose Greg Robey because he is a fighter. After over 2 weeks in a federal jury trial, I was found Not Guilty of all charges. My family and I am forever grateful to Mr. Robey.” -L.B., Mansfield, Ohio

Warrant Required to Place GPS Tracking Device on Car

GPS technology can help you find your way home, but can police use it to track your car without a warrant? That’s the question the U.S. Supreme Court addressed earlier this year in United States v. Jones.

In a rare 9-0 decision, the justices held that the police cannot put a GPS device on a suspect’s car without a warrant. The court decided that the defendant’s drug trafficking conviction must be reversed because some of the evidence used to convict him was obtained through a GPS tracking device that police attached to his car without a warrant.

While the decision was 9-0, the court was split on how it reached that decision:

  • In the majority opinion, Justice Scalia concluded that attaching the GPS device was a trespass and therefore was the type of intrusion that would have been considered a search when the Constitution was adopted. Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Thomas and Sotomayor joined in the decision.
  • In a separate concurring decision, Justice Alito said he believed that the long-term GPS monitoring of the defendant’s movements violated his reasonable expectations of privacy. Alito was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer and Kagan.
  • In another concurring decision, Justice Sotomayor said that, while this case raised difficult questions about privacy and technology, it could be determined on the narrower issue of whether placing the device on the car was a physical intrusion.

If you have been arrested, an Ohio criminal defense attorney can help determine whether the prosecution is relying on improperly obtained evidenc.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


Contact Form

Contact The Law Office of Gregory S. Robey

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.